State v. Bortz

Decided 1991-06-27

Cited by 143 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION JACOBSON, Judge. The significant issue in this case is whether Rule 32.9(a); Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires a second motion for rehearing when the trial court grants a prior motion for rehearing on a petition for post-conviction relief, grants an evidentiary hearing as a result of the first motion for rehearing, but then dismisses…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.