State v. Bash

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1996-11-07

Cited by 115 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dolliver, J. (dissenting) — I dissent. Regardless of the elaborate and sometimes tendentious argument of the majority, I believe the statute is definitely a strict liability statute. The majority attempts to convert this into a "second bite” statute, but Mr. Walt Freser was killed by the attack of the dogs. Surely the majority did not wish to make this a "second death” statute. We may have serious objec…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.