State v. . Ballance

Decided 1949-02-04

Cited by 127 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STACY, C. J., dissenting. WINBORNE, J., concurs in dissent. The defendant was charged with violating Chapter 92 of the General Statutes by engaging in the practice of photography for compensation without being licensed so to do by the State Board of Photographic Examiners. The jury returned a special verdict in which it found, in substance, that on 25 June, 1948, in Raleigh, North Carolina, a city having a population in excess of twenty-five hundred, the defendant took and produ…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.