Chief Justice EXUM dissenting. Believing that evidence of the Foster incident was improperly admitted and unfairly prejudiced defendant, I respectfully dissent and vote for a new trial. The majority concedes this evidence was not admissible to prove defendant’s identity as the perpetrator of the crime because identity was not at issue. I agree and can find no other basis upon which the evide…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.