State v. Awkal

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1996-08-14

Cited by 180 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Pfeifer, J. Appellant raises fourteen propositions of law. We have reviewed each one and have determined that none justifies the reversal of appellant’s convictions for aggravated murder or of the sentence of death. I Evidentiary Issues A Insufficient Evidence In propositions Nos. I and II, Awkal argues that the evidence proving his…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.