State v. Austin

Decided 2002-09-16

Cited by 196 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., dissenting. In a line of dissents, I have maintained that the comparative proportionality review process currently embraced by this Court fails. It fails because it does not operate to protect defendants from the arbitrary and disproportionate imposition of the death penalty. See, e.g., State v. Godsey, <a href="/opinion/1060421/state…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.