State v. Aragon

Decided 1984-11-26

Cited by 117 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HUNTLEY, Justice, concurring specially. I concur in the majority opinion with the caveat and reservation that I remain of the opinion that the Idaho capital sentencing process is unconstitutional in two respects: (1) It does not provide for utilization of the jury, which is in violation of both the Idaho and United States constitutions; and (2)…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.