State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1991-02-13

Cited by 209 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J. The question presented in this appeal is whether R.C. 955.11(A)(4)(a)(iii) is constitutional under the Due Process Clauses of the state and federal Constitutions. R.C. 955.11(A)(4)(a)(iii) provides in pertinent part: “ ‘Vicious dog’ means any dog that, without provocation and subject to division (A)(4)(b) of this section, meets any of the following: it*…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.