State v. Allen

Decided 2000-01-06

Cited by 125 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STARCHER, Chief Justice, dissenting: (Filed Jan. 6, 2000) I dissent because this defendant was clearly the subject of improper “piling on” of criminal charges. Why? Because he acted contemptuously toward the police. I also dissent because the sentence of 7 years in jail is contrary to our law’s system of incarceration, where people serving long sentences go to prisons where there are rehabili…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.