State v. Aguirre

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2010-03-04

Cited by 114 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

J.M. Johnson, J. ¶1 Daniel Marshall Aguirre appeals his convictions and sentence for assault and rape. Aguirre alleges that the trial court erred by admitting the testimony *355 of the prosecution’s expert, excluding defense testimony and limiting cross-examination, instructing the jury on the definition of “unlawful force,” and refusing to continue sentencing following h…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.