State v. Acosta

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1984-05-24

Cited by 168 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dolliver, J. (dissenting) — Because I find self-defense does not negate the mental state element of knowledge required by the second degree assault statute, RCW 9A.36-.020(l)(b), nor does the statute define absence of self-defense as an element of the offense, I dissent. Whether the State or the defendant bears the burden of proving self-defense is a reoccurring issue in Washington, as well as throughout the nat…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.