Per Curiam. Discovery Marshall asserts in his second proposition of law that the court of appeals committed reversible error by failing to make any rulings on discovery issues and by not permitting Marshall to proceed with discovery. As the parties concede, the court of appeals did not expressly rule on Marshall’s motion to compel the V Group to comply with the not…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.