State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1981-12-23

Cited by 627 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and the burden of showing a clear legal right to this writ as a remedy from a determination by the Industrial Commission of the extent of claimant’s injury is upon relator. See, generally, State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), <a href="/opinion/6864158/state-ex-rel-pressley-v-industrial-commi…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.