State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1982-03-09

Cited by 325 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Locher, J., dissenting. The majority reaches beyond the plain language of the Revised Code and indulges in judicial legislation. For this reason, I dissent. Initially, I must set forth the facts of this case which do not appear in the statement of the case. At the time of his injury, appellee was 21 years old and a laborer in the construction industry. He received treatment from Dr. Arnold O. Allenius, D.O. Duri…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.