State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. Foreman

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1997-06-18

Cited by 269 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. This appeal raises two issues. The first question presented is whether the commission, in evaluating claimant’s application for PTD compensation, abused its discretion by failing to initiate the issue of whether claimant’s retirement precludes his eligibility for PTD compensation. This question can also be framed in terms of whether the employer waived the retirement issue by not raising it administrativel…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.