State ex rel. Papp v. James

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1994-06-01

Cited by 109 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. This case presents six issues for our review. First, should either party’s evidence be stricken? Second, is there a clear legal duty to appoint a guardian ad litem upon a parent’s motion before interviewing a child in a custody dispute? Third, is there a clear legal duty in this case to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law upon timely motion? Fourth, does Elizabeth have an adequate remedy…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.