State ex rel. Matz v. Brown

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1988-07-06

Cited by 104 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. The parties stipulate that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law. We agree and therefore *280 proceed to examine the other criteria for granting a writ of mandamus— whether the relator has a clear right to the relief sought and whether respondent has a clear duty to provide that relief. State, ex rel. O.M. Scott Sons Co., v.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.