State ex rel. Lindenschmidt v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1995-07-05

Cited by 139 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. In his first proposition of law, Lindenschmidt asserts that the court of appeals abused its discretion in granting the board leave to file an answer after the twenty-eight-day period had expired. See Civ.R. 12(A)(1); Loc.R. 20(A) of the Twelfth Appellate District (“An original action * * * shall proceed as any civil action under the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.”). Civ.R. 6(B)(2) provid…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.