State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County

Decided 2004-05-25

Cited by 1,714 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. {concurring). ¶ 58. I join the mandate, but I return once again to this court's approach(es) to statutory interpretation. It is important, as I have written before, that litigants, *671 lawyers, legislators, courts, and the people of Wisconsin know and understand our approach to legislative interpretation.<footnotem…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.