State ex rel. Fuqua v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1997-07-16

Cited by 167 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. Fuqua asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his mandamus action. The court of appeals granted Alexander’s Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion when it dismissed Fuqua’s complaint. In order to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Civ.R. 12(B)(6), it must appear beyond doubt that relator can prove no set of facts warranting relief, after all factual allegat…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.