State ex rel. Enyart v. O'Neill

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1995-04-05

Cited by 106 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. In order to obtain a writ of prohibition, appellants had the burden of proving that Judge O’Neill was about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial authority, that exercise of this power was unauthorized by law, and that they had no other adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Keenan v. Calabrese (1994), <a href="/opinion/6876924/state-ex-rel-keenan-v-calabre…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.