State Ex Rel. E.R.

Decided 2001-03-08

Cited by 254 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION DAVIS, Judge: T1 FR. and TR. (Parents) appeal the results of a permanency hearing and ask that we review three issues: First, did the juvenile court improperly conclude at the permanency hearing that the two oldest children should be placed in permanent foster care and the two youngest children be placed for adoption? Second, did the juvenile court illegally consider the Guardian ad Litem's (GAL)…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.