State ex rel. Duncan v. Chippewa Township Trustees

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1995-10-11

Cited by 450 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the Duncans had to establish a clear legal right to have the road opened and maintained, a clear legal duty on the part of the trustees to open and maintain the road, and the lack of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Carter v. Wilkinson (1994), <a href="/opinion/6877598/state-ex…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.