State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. Lancaster

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1986-02-26

Cited by 110 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. The issue before us, based upon the procedural posture of this case, is whether the commission abused its discretion in finding appellant violated a specific safety requirement. 1 For the attendant reasons, we affirm the judgment below and decline to issue the requested writ. For this court to grant a writ of mandamus with respect to a decision by the Industria…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.