Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · Decided 2008-11-17

Cited by 600 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

McMAHON, District Judge: This case is one of many stemming from the so-called “contingent commission” arrangements between insurers and brokers that were prevalent prior to October 2004. “Contingent commissions” is a euphemism for kickbacks — insurance brokers would receive payments from insurers for steering business their way. Appellants purport to repr…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.