Springer v. Weeks and Leo Co., Inc.

Decided 1988-09-21

Cited by 134 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HARRIS, Justice (dissenting). Not every private or social wrong is appropriate as a basis for a tort remedy. I dissent because I think an employee at will should not be allowed damages for losing a job which had no tenure. *564 I. The facts alleged against this employer are deeply offensive. I enthusiastically join the majority in cond…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.