SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1950-01-16

Cited by 183 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dissenting Opinion by Me. Justice Linn: The complaint is sufficient, in my judgment, to require an answer, and states a case in which the defendant should wish to state why it refuses to pay. The charge is that the defendant received the regular premium; that it insured against damage to plaintiff’s property, (Hangar No. 1 in the sum of 117,50o) 1 and, after the fire settled with two…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.