Spero v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Decided 1991-02-12

Cited by 237 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Glass, J. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Guilford (board), unreasonably interpreted the meaning of a Guilford zoning regulation permitting the use of a “food and beverage take-out service from within [a restaurant] building” and excluding “takeout service windows” to prohibit the use of an outside ordering station for the placing of orders for take-out food…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.