Snyder v. Stanford

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1968-06-19

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

0 ’Neill, J. The principal ground upon which the appellant relies for reversal is the alleged misconduct of the appellee’s counsel in his opening statement and closing argument to the jury. The cause of the fire which injured the appellant was disputed throughout the trial. The appellant contends that the appellee’s counsel, in his opening statement and clos *33</page-n…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.