Smith v. Flax

U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · Decided 1980-04-09

Cited by 255 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge: The plaintiff sought damages for alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. His basic claims were submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict in his favor. Thereafter, however, the district judge granted the defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial. The plaintiff appealed, and we affirm. Prior to 1971…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.