Paul W. Bkown, J., concurring in part. I disagree that the appellant has suffered injury at this time by reason of appellee’s pipe line and so conclude that a remand for trial of the damage question is unnecessary. Presently the evidence and stipulations show that only strip mining operations are contemplated. The sole issue before the trial judge was whether or not the inability to surface mine damaged the plaintiff. "We agr…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.