Singleton v. Wulff

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1976-07-01

Cited by 3,817 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Stevens, concurring in part. In this case (1) the plaintiff-physicians have a financial stake in the outcome' of the litigation, and (2) they claim that the statute impairs their own constitutional rights. They therefore clearly have standing to bring this action. Because these two facts are present, I agree that the analysis in Part II-B of Mr. Ju…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.