Per Curiam. Appellant contends the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony as to the mere possibility of a causal connection between the chemical exposure and appellee’s terminal cancer. We agree. Dr. Kravitz, a medical expert for appellee, testified that “with a reasonable degree of probability, it is likely that this combination of those three chemicals could have caused the cance…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.