Shaw v. Burgess

Decided 2003-03-13

Cited by 260 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Peters, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). While I concur in the majority’s position that plaintiff failed to demonstrate both that the animals had vicious propensities and that “the owner knew of such propensities ‘or that they existed for such a period of time that a reasonably prudent person would have discovered them’ ” (Tessiero v Conrad, <span class="citation" data-…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.