Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1957-04-08

Cited by 195 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Reed delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner was employed by respondent to assist with dredging operations being conducted by respondent in a slough dug to by-pass a rocky section of the Mississippi *371 River. His work was that of a handyman; it included the carrying and storing of supplies, and the general maintenance of a dredge. H…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.