Sears v. Weimer

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1944-05-17

Cited by 274 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Weygandt, C. J., dissenting. With due respect for the majority opinion, it is submitted that no question of service of summons is here involved. It is true that the original service of summons in this case was made by publication, and if this wére the only manner in which the trial court obtained jurisdiction of the defendant’s person, the limitation of Secti…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.