Scott v. Ross

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1998-04-08

Cited by 110 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s finding that CAN was liable for the consequences of Landa’s negligent referral. Under Washington law, to impose liability on a principal for the acts of its agents, á plaintiff must establish not only the existence of an agency relationship but also that “th…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.