Scibilia v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1924-03-10

Cited by 100 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker, In compliance with the spirit of rule 56 of this court, counsel “substituted for the notes of testimony” an agreed statement of facts, which shows that, on May 4, 1921, plaintiff, Guiseppe Scibilia, while standing at the side of a street in Philadelphia, was injured by “an automobile truck, the property of the city,......loaded with ashes, and operated by one of the em…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.