McCormick, Presiding Judge, dissenting. I dissent. The majority disagrees with the Court of Appeals’ analysis on whether appel *21 lant was entitled to a jury instruction on false imprisonment. See Schweinle v. State, <a href="/opinion/1528497/schweinle-v-state/#714" aria-description="Citation for case: Schwe…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.