Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Company

U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Decided 1997-06-02

Cited by 393 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge, concurring: I believe that the Power Purchase Agreement between SER and PP L is susceptible of an interpretation that SER’s duty to sell exclusively to PP L is limited to the first 79.5 megawatts of its output. Therefore, I cannot agree with the majority that the “contract prevents SER from competing with PP L.” Maj. Op. at 415. Nonetheless, I…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.