OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW PER CURIAM. In his pro se petition for discretionary review, appellant argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. In the court below, appellant’s counsel raised four grounds of error. The Court of Appeals, <a href="/opinion/5234053/saylor-v-s…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.