SAS Institute, Inc. v. Breitenfeld

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 2005-07-01

Cited by 171 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PER CURIAM. The trial court in this case granted SAS Institute’s motion for summary judgment, requiring-John Breitenfeld to repay a bonus on a cancelled sale based on a commission contract between the two parties. The court of appeals reversed and rendered judgment on Breitenfeld’s motion for summary judgment against SAS, allow- <span ="1" class="star-pagination"…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.