Sanek v. Duracote Corp.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1989-06-14

Cited by 179 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Wright, J. The principal issue before this court is whether the facts in the record are sufficient, as a matter of law, to allow the issue of whether the employer committed an intentional tort to go to a jury. We hold that the facts are insufficient and we reverse the appellate court. Appellee’s intentional tort action must be determined according to the standards set forth in the fifth and sixth paragraphs of…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.