Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2008-05-22

Cited by 367 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PER CURIAM: Daniel Sandoval-Luna petitions for review of his removal proceedings. He contends that the Immigration Judge’s denial of a continuance constitutes an abuse of discretion and violation of due process, and that the qualifying relative requirement for cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D), violates his equal protection rights. The government asserts we ha…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.