Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit · Decided 1984-07-03

Cited by 128 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STARR, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority today vacates a District Court order denying Samuel Friedman’s *1347 motions to compel the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to comply with two extraordinarily broad subpoenas duces tecum et ad testificandum. Because I believe that th…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.