Salois v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1978-08-03

Cited by 110 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Brachtenbach, J. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued for amounts allegedly due from defendant Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company under an insurance policy providing hospital and surgical benefits, for mental distress damages and for attorneys' fees and damages under the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86. Defendant counterclaimed for rescission of the policy, alleging misrepresentatio…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.