Salas v. Department of Social & Health Services

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2010-06-10

Cited by 228 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chambers, J. ¶53 (dissenting) — It is not appropriate for this court to reverse the trial court based on its “failure” to make a finding no one asked it to make and that, at the time, it reasonably believed it had impliedly made by following this court’s jurisprudence. I would affirm the Court of Appeals’ well reasoned decision. I respectfully dissent. ¶54 Rogelio Salas posed two questions for our consideration:…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.