Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Butler

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1992-02-06

Cited by 260 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Dolliver, J. (dissenting) — I find the majority's opinion problematic for several reasons. First, the majority presumes harm — an essential element of a bad faith claim — and then fails to explain the nature of that harm. In the absence of a settlement like the one Butler and Zenker reached, the supposed harm to an insured stems from the fact of liability and the danger of an excess judgment at trial. See, e.g., R.A. Hanson Co…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.