Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1996-08-16

Cited by 462 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SPECTOR, Justice, dissenting. Because I believe that the majority mis-characterizes the damages awarded Saenz by the jury, I respectfully dissent. While recognizing that the “instructions make plain that ■the jury was to find the future medical costs that Saenz would incur as a result of Fidelity’s wrongfully inducing her to settle,” 925 S.W.2d 613 , the majority nevertheless…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.