S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., v. the Clorox Company

U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · Decided 2001-02-23

Cited by 152 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HALL, District Judge: This case involves a Lanham Act challenge to the truthfulness of a television commercial and print advertisement depicting the plight of an animated goldfish in a Ziploc Slide-Loc bag that is being held upside down and is leaking water. Plaintiff-appellee S.C.. Johnson Son manufactures the Ziploc bags targeted by the advertisements. In an Order dated…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.